2.0.0 beta 2
 Menu
 Home
 News
 Articles
 Forums
 Downloads
 FAQ
 Links
 Register
 Contact Us

 Login

 Users Online
There are:
0 registered users
and 4 guests online now.

Forums - General Discussion
Go up one level
 Author Message
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
37 %37 %37 %37 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

24/04/2006 07:21 GMT

Hmm, well he did write them though.



Personally, I think Lucas made the mistake of directing his own story.  He was too biased to it, to see where the flaws where.



Look at Empire Strikes Back - directed by someone else, and is usually cited as being the best film of the series.

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
34 %34 %34 %34 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

24/04/2006 10:56 GMT

He's a film producer with an eye for editing. When he bucks this talant with delusions he can do more than plot or delegate the product is usually dire.

 
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
37 %37 %37 %37 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

25/04/2006 03:44 GMT

It's noticeable that he hasn't directed anything else apart from the SW films in the last 30 years too.



I await to see him actually direct something different to see if he has any talent in that area....

 
*nobody*

Posts:

Participation
17 %17 %17 %17 %

*nobody*




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

26/04/2006 12:34 GMT

Well, "Star Wars" and the Electric Light Orchestra (in their UFO album format) were what got me into science fiction in the first place!



I saw "A New Hope" at a very tender age and it left an indelible impression on my consciousness. It's very hard to knock Lucas when you're so biased.



And as for "The Empire Strikes Back" - far out, that was good! Absloutlely fantastic!!!!!!!!



but good old Dr Who can create just as big a cult following around the world and create just as much magic and good story telling on a budget that does not even pay for the "Star Wars" cast's costs!!!!!!!

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
34 %34 %34 %34 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

26/04/2006 13:00 GMT

I'm not a fan, but I do like Empire. And American Graffiti. Immaculately edited.

 
*nobody*

Posts:

Participation
17 %17 %17 %17 %

*nobody*




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

26/04/2006 13:07 GMT

How can you NOT be a fan of "Star Wars"??????!!!!!!!!!!!



.......I haven't seen "American Graffiti", but from what I've read, it stands as a cultural document that mirrors the sociology of post world war two American society.

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
34 %34 %34 %34 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

26/04/2006 15:51 GMT

American Graffiti is an endlessly entertaining piece of art. It is to Happy Days what the MASH movie is to the TV series of the same name; the Platonic form.



Star Wars (and all the rest of that overrated universe) is fantasy which uses SF props. Despite the endless claims of originality it is highly derivitive and part of a greater overall trend of those times. And not a good one at that! The Empire Strikes Back is notably better made than the other two of the trilogy (and it is a trilogy) which is why its well thought of.

 
*nobody*

Posts:

Participation
17 %17 %17 %17 %

*nobody*




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

26/04/2006 17:58 GMT

Excuse my ignorance, but may I ask what you mean by "Despite the endless claims of originality it is highly derivitive and part of a greater overall trend of those times." (with regard to Star Wars)



> Must see "Amerian Graffiti" one day

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
34 %34 %34 %34 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

27/04/2006 05:34 GMT

Between The Dam Busters, Dune and Samurai movies there's not a lot left (indeed it even mentions The Hidden Fortress in its dialogue!). I have no idea why people cite it as originating the "used universe", and surmise they're not very SF literate.



SF was in a sad state in the early '70s. It'd been fed a rough diet of fantasy and the results were often sickening.

 
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
37 %37 %37 %37 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

27/04/2006 09:13 GMT

SF was practically non-existent in the early 70s, before SW.



One of the few shows I can think of with an SF theme in that time would be Space 1999...which isn't really saying much!!

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
34 %34 %34 %34 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

28/04/2006 06:12 GMT

SF was alive and well on the screen prior to Star Wars, which we can thank for the view that the genre was a cash cow by Hollywood and the genre's dumbing down.



For instance there were two Australian SF series--Alpha Scorpio and Andra. 1970 saw the third in a series of budget Australian space operas, Phoenix Five.



Apes and Bionic men (and women) flourished across all media. For the more adult TV viewer there was Doomwatch and Moonbase 3. And for the more juvenile The Tomorrow People, Sky and Timeslip. I haven't even broached anthologies,  animation, the big screen or the brothers Krofft.



Lucas and his generation should be remembered as the men and women who killed mid-range movie making stone dead. They're no friends of ours!

 
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
37 %37 %37 %37 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

29/04/2006 07:03 GMT

Lucas and Co, were the ones who introduced the blockbuster, good or bad is open to debate.



From that list Martin, the only shows I know of are The Tomorrow People and Timeslip.



Although I do remember watching The Six Million Dollar Man, and Wonder Woman - which makes me feel quite old now!!!!!!

 
sneb

Posts: 27

Participation
5 %5 %5 %5 %

sneb




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

29/04/2006 07:19 GMT

Doomwatch? What is that all about? Wasn't that created by Gerry Davies and Kit Pedler?

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
34 %34 %34 %34 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

29/04/2006 07:46 GMT

Blockbusters had been around, there's a cycle of destruction that goes along with this! The Tomorrow People and Timeslip were of a certain type, and shared the same producer. They're available on tape and disc, the others aren't. Indeed Sky and Andra are rumoured to have been destroyed or damaged to the point where they are considred untransmittable.

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
34 %34 %34 %34 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: The Best and Worst of Dr Who

29/04/2006 07:52 GMT

Doomwatch was a downbeat adult show about a government body (the Department of Observation and Measurement of Scientific Work) dealing with threats to the environment. Two episodes exist from the first year (untransmitted in Australia), which have been released on video--The Plastic Eater (a virus muates to the point where it can consume plastic) and Tomorrow--The Rat (a genetically altered rat strain escapes). Gerry Davis and Kit Pedler left after the second year and Terrance Dudley took over--making it into more of an action show, and earning Davis' anger in return.

 

 Previous1 2 ]
Go up one level

 
 This website was created with phpWebThings 2.0.0 beta 2.
(c)2006 Copyright,SFSA