2.0.0 beta 2
 Menu
 Home
 News
 Articles
 Forums
 Downloads
 FAQ
 Links
 Register
 Contact Us

 Login

 Users Online
There are:
0 registered users
and 3 guests online now.

Forums - General Discussion
Go up one level
 Author Message
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
36 %36 %36 %36 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  General Sci Fi

21/04/2006 07:22 GMT

Is there anyone here who has seen Babylon 5 and Farscape?



I've heard a lot about both shows and curious as to anyone's opinions on them.



If they've both good, I'll check them out.

 
zaphod

Posts: 121

Participation
3 %3 %3 %3 %

zaphod


Admin


offline

 WWW  Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

21/04/2006 12:30 GMT

B5 was great, a 5 year plan that actually worked, reasonable sets and some actual acting



Not to mention the main reason for watching B5....Claudia Christian


Never settle with words when a flamethrower is so much more fun ...
 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
33 %33 %33 %33 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

21/04/2006 13:10 GMT

Babylon 5 is usually cited as the height of what adult science fiction is capable of on the small screen. And Farscape is probably as good as you're going to see made in Australia.

 
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
36 %36 %36 %36 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

22/04/2006 02:58 GMT

hmm ok, both sound very good.



I'll watch them after I've finished watching the Stargate dvds someone got me.  I've been impressed with it so far, a smartly written show that doesn't take itself too seriously.

 
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
36 %36 %36 %36 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

24/04/2006 07:25 GMT

Now, can anyone explain to me the appeal of 'Lost In Space'? 



I watched an episode recently, and wasnt impressed at all.  I remember not liking it as a kid either.



Such a silly show - or is it just me??



Any fans out there care to correct me?

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
33 %33 %33 %33 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

24/04/2006 10:44 GMT

Probably the best thing about it was the music. John Williams' best.



Gene Roddenberry did a pitch for CBS. He told them about Star Trek, with examples from the pilot, for an hour. They said "Thanks. We've already got one."

 
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
36 %36 %36 %36 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

25/04/2006 03:46 GMT

Shows you what tv executives know!



I know a lot of people who love Lost In Space, but it always left me cold.



The film version wasn't that good either, although it must be said that Matt Le Blanc played his one dimensional character very well - no acting required!!!

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
33 %33 %33 %33 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

25/04/2006 04:34 GMT

I'm a lot more sympathetic towards executives than most fans-- largely becuase I'm sceptical about TV poducers and their self serving accounts.

 
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
36 %36 %36 %36 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

26/04/2006 08:20 GMT

Well some producers try to create the program they feel the executives want to see.



Look at the JNT era - a lot of the stories during that were attempts to please the 'higher ups'.  Especially the McCoy era, which had stories that were 'lighter', due to the direct demands of certain tv executives, to move away from the 'dark era' of the Colin Baker years.

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
33 %33 %33 %33 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

26/04/2006 09:26 GMT

All producers have to regard the progamme as a commodity, and the first sale has to be to their superiors. But I doubt any one in the BBC told JNT to make everything blled green!

 
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
36 %36 %36 %36 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

26/04/2006 09:48 GMT

Nor would they have told JNT to make Warriors of the Deep look like an advert for floodlights!!!



He became too obsessed with the marketing side of Dr Who and not the actual stories.



It was all very well trying to please the fans, but the problem was trying to get new people interested in the show.

 
*nobody*

Posts:

Participation
13 %13 %13 %13 %

*nobody*




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

26/04/2006 11:49 GMT

It does seem that all JNT could think of was marketing...and men!



Davison was cast purely for marketing reasons.......he was 'advertised' as the 'dishy Doctor'.

cripes!!!!

 
jestear

Posts: 582

Participation
10 %10 %10 %10 %

jestear




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

26/04/2006 12:19 GMT

what are you saying about JNT?

 
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
36 %36 %36 %36 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

27/04/2006 04:14 GMT

Not forgetting also, that with Tegan, Nyssa, & Adric, he had companions that never changed their wardrobe.  Making it easier to market toys in their likeness.



JNT seemed to be going to conventions more than concentrating on the show itself.  No wonder Eric Saward did his  head in!!!!

 
jestear

Posts: 582

Participation
10 %10 %10 %10 %

jestear




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

27/04/2006 04:49 GMT

yeah but didnt the doctor lose half the Tardis in castrovala maybe the dressing room was amoung them. but not the laundry

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
33 %33 %33 %33 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

27/04/2006 06:10 GMT

No, only a quarter (of what?).



He made Tom change into a more uniform costume for marketing; Tom waited a couple of episodes and changed his shoes back!



Another strange marketing decision on JNT's behalf was...himself! Doctor Who producers had come and gone without much murmer (until those nasty big kids Holmes and Hinchcliffe had to be broken up and sent to different ends of the yard). UK fans complained about his focus on the US and particulalry his personal appearences there. As an interesting footnote, I've found an interview he did for the ABC in c1979...while he was still a lowly production unit manager! There's never been anyone like him attached to the show.

 
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
36 %36 %36 %36 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

27/04/2006 09:06 GMT

It could be said that Dr WHo merchandise came of age during the JNT era.



Quite a lot of the video specials of the 1990s were due to his input.



Whilst I agree that he was the right producer to shake things up a bit in the early 80s, he should have left much sooner than he did.



The ongoing personal conflict between him and Eric Saward did the show no favours at all.

 
Martin

Posts: 840

Participation
33 %33 %33 %33 %

Martin


Admin


offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

28/04/2006 05:07 GMT

Didn't do either man much either! JNT was at the end bitter about some of his treatment by fandom, and Saward. And  he made sure everyone knew!

 
axelf

Posts: 444

Participation
36 %36 %36 %36 %

axelf




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

28/04/2006 06:13 GMT

It's interesting to note that Saward has been more vocal about his time on Dr Who since JNT's death.....

 
*nobody*

Posts:

Participation
13 %13 %13 %13 %

*nobody*




offline

   Male
 
 
Subject:  Re: General Sci Fi

28/04/2006 11:51 GMT

This is all news to me!



JNT is embarassing, so I've never bothered to read much about him.

> Though Axel F is right (again!) - JNT did do a lot for marketing the show after it went off TV in the 90s.........but if his production skills were good then, WHY DIDN'T HE USE THEM TO KEEP THE SHOW ALIVE IN THE 80s????????

 

1 2 ] Next
Go up one level

 
 This website was created with phpWebThings 2.0.0 beta 2.
(c)2006 Copyright,SFSA